Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer vs Matthew Forbes Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kjaer vs Forbes analysis and find out who is favored!
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer vs Matthew Forbes Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kjaer 0 - 0 Forbes
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kjaer has won 55.61% of points on their second serve, while Forbes has won 48.75%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kjaer, in recent form, has won 61% of their opponent's second serve points, while Forbes has won 47.89%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.9% and 28.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kjaer has saved 65.31% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Forbes has saved 45% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kjaer has won 73.68% of matches played (W/L 14/ 5), with Forbes winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kjaer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 100% (W/L 1/ 0), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2). Forbes has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Kjaer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 81.25% of matches (W/L 13/ 3), where as Forbes has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 3/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kjaer has played against opponents with an average rank of 91.95 while Forbes has played against players with an average rank of 333.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kjaer has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Forbes has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kjaer has converted 56.91% of breakpoint opportunities, and Forbes has converted 42.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
753
Rank
748
High
17
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
Form
L
W
W
W
L
74% (14-5)
Career Total W/L
60% (3-2)
82% (14-3)
YTD W/L
60% (3-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Nicolai Budkov Kjaer vs Matthew Forbes For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Kjaer VS Forbes
Sportsbook
Offer
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nicolai Budkov Kjaer | Matthew Forbes |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 82% (14/3) | 60% (3/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 78% (29/8) | 50% (6/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 63% (205/123) | 52% (60/56) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 91% (10/1) | 60% (3/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.16 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 26 | 6 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 44 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:56 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 95.18 | 333 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (573/965) | 61% (123/203) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (387/573) | 63% (77/123) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 56% (218/392) | 49% (39/80) |
| BPs Won% Total | 57% (70/123) | 43% (6/14) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (489/1014) | 36% (70/197) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 81% (13/3) | 60% (3/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 82% (14/17) | 60% (3/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (12/12) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (12/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 40% (5/2) | 0% (2/0) |
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| F |
Stats 
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Yanaki Milev
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Michael Agwi
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Giovanni Calvano
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
71%
(
53 of
75)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
37 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Matthew William Donald
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eero Vasa
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Niels Visker
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Stijn Slump
48%
(
21 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
95%
(
20 of
21)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Jiri Barnat
54%
(
45 of
83)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
70)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Matthew Forbes Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex Rybakov
Player
Matthew Forbes
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Forbes
Player
Ryan Dickerson
57%
(
54 of
94)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
39 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
97
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 5-7 10-6 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Toby Alex Kodat
Player
Matthew Forbes
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-7(4) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 7-6(3) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Kjaer Vs Forbes Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Kjaer are available here and Forbes photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
